Sharon Lebell's Joy of Living
Modern Linguistic Nuance
From Ancient Commands to Modern Conversation
Reading a classical Stoic text like Epictetus’s Enchiridion can feel like receiving a set of unyielding instructions from a stern teacher. The original Greek, transcribed by his student Arrian, is direct and authoritative. Sharon Lebell’s 1994 interpretation, The Art of Living, intentionally dismantles this ancient framework. She swaps the formal, rigid tone for something that feels more like a gentle, encouraging conversation with a wise friend.
This shift isn’t just a matter of updating old words. It’s a complete reimagining of the text’s voice. Where traditional translations use imperative verbs—commands like "Do this" or "Do not desire that"—Lebell often reframes these ideas as invitations or introspective questions. A strict directive becomes a prompt for self-reflection. This stylistic choice makes the philosophy feel less like a set of rules to be obeyed and more like a set of tools to be tried out in one's own life. The goal is no longer just to understand Epictetus, but to internalize his wisdom in a personal way.
He translates and paraphrases Greek philosophy, weaving in illustrations from Roman history and suggestions of Roman mould in a form intended to make it, if not popular, at least comprehensible, to the Roman mind.
New Words for Old Worries
One of the biggest hurdles for modern readers of Stoicism is its specialized vocabulary. A key concept is ta adiaphora, typically translated as "the indifferents." This term refers to things outside our direct control, such as health, wealth, and reputation. While accurate, the word "indifferent" can be misleading. It might suggest we shouldn’t care about these things at all, which isn’t quite what the Stoics meant.
Lebell bypasses this jargon entirely. She avoids terms like "indifferents" or "externals" and instead talks about these concepts in plain language that resonates with contemporary life. She speaks of "reputation," "social status," "health," and "material possessions." This makes the ideas immediately clear. The reader doesn't have to pause to decode a technical philosophical term; the wisdom is delivered in the language we already use to think about our daily anxieties.
| Traditional Term | Lebell's Plain-English Equivalent |
|---|---|
| Externals / Indifferents | Things we don't have direct control over |
| Assent / Impressions | Judgments we form about events |
| Prohairesis (Moral Choice) | The faculty of choice; our considered will |
| Apatheia (Freedom from Passion) | Tranquility; serenity |
Timeless Wisdom, Not a History Lesson
Epictetus lived and taught within the specific context of the Roman Empire. His original lectures, as recorded by Arrian, contain references to slavery, gladiators, and Roman political offices. For instance, Epictetus himself was born a slave. While these details are historically significant, they can create a barrier for a modern reader seeking practical guidance.
Lebell makes a deliberate choice to omit most of this historical context. Her goal is not to provide a scholarly translation but to deliver the psychological and ethical core of Epictetus's teachings. By stripping away the Roman-specific elements, she makes the wisdom feel universal and timeless. The lessons are no longer about how a Roman should live, but about how a person should live. This approach sacrifices historical fidelity for the sake of immediate accessibility and personal relevance, a trade-off that has made The Art of Living a popular entry point into Stoic thought.
Let's review some key ideas before you test your knowledge.
Ready to check your understanding?
According to the text, how does the tone of Sharon Lebell's The Art of Living differ from traditional translations of Epictetus?
How does Sharon Lebell handle the specialized Stoic term ta adiaphora ("the indifferents") in her interpretation?
By focusing on modern language and universal human experiences, Lebell's work serves as a powerful bridge to ancient wisdom.

