Mastering Critical Reasoning
Anatomy of Arguments
The Building Blocks of Arguments
Have you ever tried to convince someone of something? Maybe that your favourite video game is the best, or that you should be allowed to stay up later. When you do this, you're making an argument. An argument isn't just about disagreeing; it's about giving reasons to support your point of view.
Every solid argument is built from two types of parts: the conclusion and the premises.
The conclusion is the main point you are trying to make. It’s what you want the other person to believe.
The premises are the reasons or evidence you give to support your conclusion. They are the legs your argument stands on.
Think of it like building with LEGO bricks. The premises are the individual bricks you carefully place down. The conclusion is the cool thing you've built at the end, like a castle or a spaceship. Without the bricks (the premises), your final creation (the conclusion) would have nothing to stand on and would just fall apart.
Spotting the Clues
So, how can you tell which part is the premise and which is the conclusion? Luckily, language gives us clues. These are called indicator words. They signal what's coming next in the argument.
| Indicator Type | Example Words |
|---|---|
| Conclusion Indicators | therefore, so, thus, consequently, it follows that |
| Premise Indicators | because, since, for, given that, as shown by |
Let's see this in action. Look at this sentence:
"The ground is wet, therefore it must have rained."
The word "therefore" points to the conclusion. So, "it must have rained" is the conclusion, and "the ground is wet" is the premise supporting it.
Here’s another one:
*"We should go to the park, because it's a sunny day."
This time, "because" points to the premise. The premise is "it's a sunny day," and the conclusion is "we should go to the park."
Putting Arguments in Order
To really understand an argument and see if it makes sense, it helps to tidy it up. We can rewrite it in what's called This just means we list the premises first, one by one, and then we write the conclusion at the end. It lets us see the argument's skeleton, without any distracting or emotional language.
Let’s take an argument you might see in an advert: "You should buy our new cereal, Power Puffs, since it has more vitamins than any other brand and eating vitamins is good for you."
Here's how we'd put that in Standard Form: Premise 1: Eating vitamins is good for you. Premise 2: Power Puffs cereal has more vitamins than any other brand. Conclusion: Therefore, you should buy Power Puffs cereal.
See how clear that is? Now you can look at each piece separately. Is Premise 1 true? Is Premise 2 true? And even if they are, do they really mean you have to buy the cereal? Tidying up the argument helps you think more clearly about it.
When you put an argument in Standard Form, you are mapping its logical flow. You can see how the premises are supposed to connect to and support the conclusion. This simple act of organising an argument is the first step to becoming a great
Now that you can identify the parts of an argument, let's review.
Time to test your new skills.
What are the two essential components of any argument?
In the sentence, "It's going to rain, so I should take an umbrella," which part is the conclusion?
Well done. You now have the basic tools to take apart any argument you find and see how it works. This will help you make better decisions and not be so easily swayed by clever advertising or weak reasoning.