No history yet

Numbers and Equations

Numbers and Their Building Blocks

Every composite number can be broken down into a unique product of prime numbers. This simple but powerful idea is called the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic and it's the bedrock of number theory. Think of prime numbers as the basic bricks, and composite numbers as the structures you build with them. No matter how you arrange the construction process, the set of bricks for any given structure is always the same.

Lesson image

For example, let's factorise the number 140. We can start by dividing it by the smallest prime, 2.

140=2×7070=2×3535=5×7140 = 2 \times 70 \\ 70 = 2 \times 35 \\ 35 = 5 \times 7
140=22×51×71140 = 2^2 \times 5^1 \times 7^1

Finding Common Ground

This method of prime factorisation is incredibly useful for finding the Highest Common Factor (HCF) and Lowest Common Multiple (LCM) of two or more numbers. You might remember finding these using listing methods, but prime factorisation is more systematic, especially for larger numbers.

To find the HCF, you take the product of the smallest power of each common prime factor.

To find the LCM, you take the product of the greatest power of each prime factor involved.

Let's find the HCF and LCM of 90 and 144. First, we find their prime factorisations: 90 = 2 × 3 × 3 × 5 = 2¹ × 3² × 5¹ 144 = 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 3 × 3 = 2⁴ × 3²

HCF(90,144)=21×32=2×9=18\text{HCF}(90, 144) = 2^1 \times 3^2 = 2 \times 9 = 18
LCM(90,144)=24×32×51=16×9×5=720\text{LCM}(90, 144) = 2^4 \times 3^2 \times 5^1 = 16 \times 9 \times 5 = 720

The Nature of Numbers

We can classify real numbers into two groups: rational and irrational. Rational numbers can be expressed as a fraction p/qp/q, where pp and qq are integers and q0q \neq 0. Irrational numbers cannot. Proving a number is irrational often requires a special technique called proof by contradiction..

Let's prove that 2√2 is irrational. We start by assuming the opposite: that 2√2 is rational. This means we can write it as a fraction in its simplest form.

  1. Assume 2√2 is rational. So, 2=a/b√2 = a/b, where a and b are integers with no common factors other than 1 (co-prime), and b ≠ 0.
  2. Squaring both sides gives 2=a2/b22 = a²/b², which means 2b2=a22b² = a².
  3. This tells us that a2 is an even number. If a square is even, the number itself must be even. So, aa is even.
  4. We can write a=2ca = 2c for some integer cc.
  5. Substituting this into our equation from step 2: 2b2=(2c)2=4c22b² = (2c)² = 4c². Dividing by 2 gives b2=2c2b² = 2c².
  6. This means b2 is also even, so bb must be even.
  7. Here is the contradiction. We stated that aa and bb have no common factors, but we have just shown they are both even, meaning they share a common factor of 2. Our initial assumption must be false. Therefore, 2√2 is irrational.

This same logic can be used to prove that 3√3, 5√5, and other similar roots are irrational.

The World of Polynomials

Moving from numbers to algebra, let's revisit polynomials. A quadratic polynomial has the general form ax2+bx+cax² + bx + c, where a0a \neq 0. The 'zeros' of a polynomial are the values of xx for which the polynomial equals zero. For a quadratic polynomial, there's a direct relationship between its zeros and its coefficients.

If the zeros of the polynomial ax2+bx+cax² + bx + c are α\alpha and β\beta, then:

Sum of the zeros: α+β=b/a\alpha + \beta = -b/a Product of the zeros: α×β=c/a\alpha \times \beta = c/a

These relationships are powerful. They let us find the sum and product of zeros without actually solving for them.

For the polynomial 2x28x+62x² - 8x + 6, we have a=2a=2, b=8b=-8, and c=6c=6. Sum of zeros = (8)/2=4-(-8)/2 = 4. Product of zeros = 6/2=36/2 = 3.

Let's check. The zeros of this polynomial are 1 and 3. Sum = 1+3=41+3=4. Product = 1×3=31 \times 3=3. It works!

Solving Equations Together

Many real-world problems involve multiple conditions, which can be modelled as a pair of linear equations with two variables. For example: x+y=5x + y = 5 2xy=42x - y = 4

The solution is the pair of (x,y)(x, y) values that satisfies both equations simultaneously. We can find this solution graphically or algebraically.

Graphically, the solution is the point where the lines representing the two equations intersect. Algebraically, we can use methods like substitution or elimination.

Substitution Method

  1. Solve one equation for one variable. From x+y=5x + y = 5, we get y=5xy = 5 - x.
  2. Substitute this expression into the other equation: 2x(5x)=42x - (5 - x) = 4.
  3. Solve for xx: 2x5+x=4    3x=9    x=32x - 5 + x = 4 \implies 3x = 9 \implies x = 3.
  4. Substitute the value of xx back into the rearranged equation: y=53=2y = 5 - 3 = 2. The solution is (3,2)(3, 2).

Elimination Method

  1. Line up the equations. Notice that the coefficients of yy are 1-1 and +1+1. We can eliminate yy by adding the two equations together.
Equation 1x+y=5x + y = 5
Equation 22xy=42x - y = 4
Sum3x+0=93x + 0 = 9
  1. Solve for the remaining variable: 3x=9    x=33x = 9 \implies x = 3.
  2. Substitute this value back into either original equation. Using the first one: 3+y=5    y=23 + y = 5 \implies y = 2. The solution is again (3,2)(3, 2). Both algebraic methods give the same result as the graphical approach.

Let's test what you've learned about these core concepts.

Quiz Questions 1/6

What does the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic state?

Quiz Questions 2/6

If the prime factorisation of two numbers are 23×3×522^3 \times 3 \times 5^2 and 22×33×52^2 \times 3^3 \times 5, what is their Highest Common Factor (HCF)?

These topics form the bridge from foundational maths to the more advanced problems you'll face. Mastering them is key.