No history yet

Process Characterization

Beyond the Flow

You already know how to use Value Stream Mapping to visualize the flow of work. Now, it's time to dig deeper. A simple map shows the path, but it doesn't always reveal the hidden turbulence within each step. To truly optimize a complex system, we need to move from mapping to characterization—understanding the process's personality, its habits, and its quirks.

This means looking past the simple sequence of events and starting to quantify the relationships and variations that define how a process actually behaves. We'll start by adding a layer of detail to a familiar tool.

While the SIPOC diagram provides a high-level process map, it serves as a precursor to more detailed process mapping activities that occur in later phases of the DMAIC methodology.

A standard SIPOC (Suppliers, Inputs, Process, Outputs, Customers) diagram gives you a 30,000-foot view. It's useful for defining scope, but it often masks critical details. Granular SIPOC analysis breaks each category down to reveal hidden dependencies.

For example, an 'Input' for a software build might just be 'code'. A granular view would specify 'peer-reviewed feature branch', 'passing unit test results', and 'dependency vulnerability scan report'. Suddenly, you see that the 'Supplier' isn't just one developer, but a whole system of automated checks and team approvals. Mapping these details exposes potential failure points and delays that a high-level map would miss.

This detailed view is the foundation for understanding process behavior. Once we see all the moving parts, we can start to measure them and analyze their stability.

Listening to the Process

Every process has a voice, speaking through the data it generates. A Process Behavior Chart, also known as a control chart, is how we listen. It plots a key metric over time, distinguishing between the natural, inherent variation of a stable process and unpredictable, exceptional events.

The chart establishes a central line (the average) and upper and lower control limits. These limits define the expected range of variation. As long as the data points stay between these boundaries and don't form any non-random patterns, the process is considered stable and in control.

Variation

noun

The inevitable differences among individual outputs of a process. There are two main types.

The key is to differentiate between two types of variation:

  1. Common Cause Variation: This is the background noise of your process. It's the cumulative effect of many small, unavoidable causes. It is inherent to the system and predictable within the control limits.
  2. Special Cause Variation: This is a signal that something has changed. It's caused by a specific, identifiable event—a new machine setting, a faulty batch of material, an untrained operator. These points fall outside the control limits or show non-random patterns.

Trying to 'fix' common cause variation by reacting to individual data points will only make the process worse. The correct response is to improve the entire system. Special cause variation, however, demands investigation to find and address the specific root cause.

By visualizing data this way, you stop chasing ghosts and start focusing your improvement efforts where they will have the most impact.

Dependencies and Data

Process behavior charts are excellent for tracking a single output over time. But complex processes often have outputs that are influenced by multiple, interacting inputs. Sometimes these relationships are non-linear, where a small change in an input causes a disproportionately large change in the output.

Identifying these dependencies requires moving beyond one-dimensional charts. Scatter plots are a simple way to start. By plotting an input variable against an output variable, you can often see a relationship emerge—a line, a curve, or a cluster. This visual analysis helps you form hypotheses about which inputs are the most critical drivers of your process's performance.

For more complex, multi-variable situations, statistical techniques like regression analysis can quantify these relationships. The goal is to create a model that predicts the output based on the inputs. This allows you to understand which input levers have the biggest impact and how they might interact with each other.

Characterizing your process isn't a one-time event. It's a continuous cycle of detailed mapping, data collection, and analysis. By understanding the true behavior of your value streams, you can make targeted, effective improvements that go far beyond surface-level changes.

Quiz Questions 1/5

What is the primary goal of moving from simple process mapping to process characterization?

Quiz Questions 2/5

How does a Granular SIPOC analysis differ from a standard SIPOC diagram?