Carbon Finance and ESG Implementation in Nepal
Nepalese Carbon Market Transition
Nepal's New Carbon Market
For years, Nepal successfully used the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) under the Kyoto Protocol. This system helped finance small-scale hydropower and biogas projects by allowing them to sell carbon credits. However, the global climate framework has changed. The Paris Agreement introduces a more complex and rigorous system, requiring Nepal to adapt its approach to carbon trading.
The new rulebook is primarily defined by Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. This article establishes two main pathways for international carbon trading, replacing the older CDM system. For Nepal, this means projects that were once straightforward to register now face a higher bar for approval and verification.
The Rules of Article 6
Article 6 creates a framework for countries to cooperate in achieving their emissions reduction targets, known as Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). It’s split into two key mechanisms.
| Mechanism | Description | Participants | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Article 6.2 | Allows countries to trade emission reductions directly with each other. | Governments | Bilateral agreements for trading ITMOs. |
| Article 6.4 | Creates a new global carbon market, similar to the CDM, for public and private entities. | Governments and Private Sector | A central UN body supervises projects to ensure integrity. |
Under Article 6.2, countries can engage in bilateral agreements to trade credits, which are called Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcomes (ITMOs). Article 6.4 establishes a new supervisory body to register projects that reduce emissions, creating credits that can be bought by countries or corporations to meet their climate goals. Many of Nepal's existing CDM projects are now seeking to transition to this new Article 6.4 mechanism.
Navigating the Transition
The shift from the CDM to Article 6 introduces stricter requirements, primarily focused on two principles: additionality and avoiding double counting.
Additionality means a project's emission reductions would not have occurred without the incentive from selling carbon credits. If a project is already profitable or required by law, it isn't 'additional' and doesn't qualify.
The biggest change, however, is the new system to prevent double counting. Under the Kyoto Protocol, this was less of a concern because only developed nations had binding emission targets. Now, under the Paris Agreement, almost all countries have their own NDCs. This creates a risk: a project in Nepal could reduce emissions, sell a credit to another country, and both Nepal and the buying country could claim the same reduction. To prevent this, the system requires to be made.
This means that if Nepal authorizes the sale of a carbon credit from a hydropower project to an international buyer, its government must adjust its own national emissions inventory. The emission reduction is transferred to the buyer's country and can no longer be counted toward Nepal's NDC. This process ensures that every reduction is counted only once.
New Government Procedures
Nepal's Ministry of Forests and Environment (MoFE) acts as the Designated National Authority, responsible for authorizing any project participation in Article 6 markets. The procedure for transitioning a CDM project or starting a new one involves several key steps. The government must formally approve the project and agree to make a corresponding adjustment upon the eventual sale of any credits.
This new, centralized oversight ensures that all carbon trading activities align with Nepal's national climate strategy and contribute to sustainable development without compromising the country's own targets. For project developers, this means earlier and more sustained engagement with the government is essential for success.
Time for a quick check on these new concepts.
What is the primary mechanism introduced by the Paris Agreement to prevent the double counting of emission reductions in international carbon trading?
A hydropower project in Nepal sells a carbon credit to another country under Article 6. What must the Nepalese government do to ensure the emission reduction is not counted by both parties?
The transition to the Paris Agreement's framework presents both challenges and opportunities for Nepal. By establishing clear procedures and embracing the new standards for integrity and transparency, the country can continue to leverage international carbon markets to drive investment in its green transition.
